Are you able to think about not solely being forbidden to fall in love, however getting sued for it as properly?
In 2016, a courtroom in Tokyo dominated in favor of a 23-year previous Japanese singer after her personal firm sued her for being in a relationship with a fan. They claimed that this went in opposition to the “no relationship clause” in her contract which she signed in 2012.
The choose, nevertheless, disagreed with the corporate. Katsuya Hara said that “relationships are a proper” and due to this fact sided with the J-Pop idol. He threw out their declare of ¥9.9 million (round $66,400 USD) because of this.
We should acknowledge that forbidding pop idols so far by claiming compensation for damages goes too far. Relationships are a proper exercised by a person to enrich life. They’re a part of the liberty to pursue happiness.
— Katsuya Hara, the chief choose of the Tokyo District Court docket
Reporters imagine that the idol in query is from Aoyama Saint Hachamecha Excessive College, a seven member J-Pop group who was managed by MovingFactory from 2012 to 2015.
In 2014, the corporate accused members Miho Yuki and Sena Miura of “betraying” the group by selecting to be in relationships, discrediting their public claims of leaving as a result of sickness. In actuality, they fired the women and proceeded to sue for damages.
They’ve betrayed the members of the group and all their followers.
This isn’t the primary time J-Pop idols have been demonized for locating themselves in relationships. In 2013, a member of common J-Pop group AKB48, Minegishi Minami, went viral world wide after she shaved her hair and uploaded a tearful apology video—all as a result of she was caught leaving the home of her then-boyfriend.
Equally, a 17-year previous member of J-Pop group DokiDoki was ordered by Tokyo District Court docket Decide Akimoto Kojima to pay ¥650,000 (round $4,400 USD) to her ex-company after a photograph of her with a person in a resort room was leaked. The choose claimed that it was essential for idols to look single with the intention to safe male followers and thus monetary assist for the group.
As a way to safe the monetary assist of male followers, a clause prohibiting relationships was essential
— Akimoto Kojima, Tokyo District Court docket Decide
What’s Taking place Round The World
“Loopy Horse” Denies Angelababy Visited Venue Following Backlash
Truth Examine: Is Jamaica The First Nation To Ban Ok-Pop?
“Can I Contact Your Abs?”: Korean Music Artist Goes Viral For His Unbelievable Fan Service
Actor Paul Wesley Goes Viral For His Response To Stray Youngsters
Share This Put up